superstardeejay
Member
- Joined
- 2010
- Posts
- 13
- Geo
- uk midlands
After the whole episode I'd have been more impressed had Heidelberg used industry-standard drives and controls rather than try to make their own which are difficult to fault-find on without going cap in hand to the manufacturer..which is what they want of course!
We had approached an independent Heidelberg dealer who was going to post us a BLT as he was certain that was the fault. As I said before, it took Heidelberg themselves most of the day to find this fault, since, like us, they'd checked for the most common things to cause this rather than an unplugged encoder which, though simple, was by their own admission, way down the list of things to check as it rarely happens.
A standard Control Techniques, Siemens, Mitsubishi etc brushless servodrive would have reported 'encoder fault' or 'feedback error' rather than some nondescript 15-01 code which the manual is rather vague about!
The fault finding route taken was a trade-off (or gamble) that the manager took since most press repairs here are carried out in-house, whether it's having a membrane keyboard remanufactured for an obsolete AB-Dick, a switch-mode rebuilt for a high speed collator or a replacement light guard for an old guillotine. It didnt (and still doesnt) make economic sense to always get the manufacturer in for what may be a simple fault (especially at Heidelberg's exhorbitant rates) and they will always be the last port of call. I am on the side of the end user here, not the manufacturer of the machinery, whose equipment, after all, did us the discourtesy of failing!
We had approached an independent Heidelberg dealer who was going to post us a BLT as he was certain that was the fault. As I said before, it took Heidelberg themselves most of the day to find this fault, since, like us, they'd checked for the most common things to cause this rather than an unplugged encoder which, though simple, was by their own admission, way down the list of things to check as it rarely happens.
A standard Control Techniques, Siemens, Mitsubishi etc brushless servodrive would have reported 'encoder fault' or 'feedback error' rather than some nondescript 15-01 code which the manual is rather vague about!
The fault finding route taken was a trade-off (or gamble) that the manager took since most press repairs here are carried out in-house, whether it's having a membrane keyboard remanufactured for an obsolete AB-Dick, a switch-mode rebuilt for a high speed collator or a replacement light guard for an old guillotine. It didnt (and still doesnt) make economic sense to always get the manufacturer in for what may be a simple fault (especially at Heidelberg's exhorbitant rates) and they will always be the last port of call. I am on the side of the end user here, not the manufacturer of the machinery, whose equipment, after all, did us the discourtesy of failing!