Color Printing & Color Printer Forum
Digital Printing Press Forum: Kodak NexPress Digital Presses

Go Back   Color Printing Forum > Digital Printing Press Forum > Kodak NexPress Digital Presses
Kodak NexPress M700 vs. Canon imagePRESS C7000VP Kodak NexPress M700 vs. Canon imagePRESS C7000VP
Register FAQ Members List Print Directory Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2 Color Offset Press 4+ Color Offset Press Direct Imaging Printing Press Digital Printing Press Color Copiers and Color Laser Printers Finishing Equipment Inkjet and Art Printers
2-Color Offset 4+ Color Offset Direct Imaging Digital Press Color Copiers Finishing Inkjet & Fine Art

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2007, 02:28 AM
Inkboy Inkboy is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Default Kodak NexPress M700 vs. Canon imagePRESS C7000VP
I read an article blurb today about the new Kodak NexPress M700 which is based on the Canon imagePRESS C7000VP print engine. The article states that the NexPress M700 has more user-replaceable components than the straight Canon ImagePress C7000VP which means more uptime and less interruption of print runs for service calls. Is there a cost for this though?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2007, 05:48 AM
billy billy is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cebu, Phil.
Posts: 28
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inkboy View Post
I read an article blurb today about the new Kodak NexPress M700 which is based on the Canon imagePRESS C7000VP print engine. The article states that the NexPress M700 has more user-replaceable components than the straight Canon ImagePress C7000VP which means more uptime and less interruption of print runs for service calls. Is there a cost for this though?
Hi Inkboy,
Kodak Nexpress M700 is the OEM of Imagepress C7000VP. The only difference is the Print Controller. Kodak use thier own DFE while Canon use the Fiery System A3000, A2000, A1000 and the PCL. The Next question is? Which of them give the Good Support?

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:30 PM
nyhunter nyhunter is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 4
Default
None
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2007, 10:42 PM
indolering indolering is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 37
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyhunter View Post
None
HA! While highly location dependent this is true. I heard that the NexPress was being positioned as a transitional machine for the offset market, with service contracts not being click based, to save money...

Kinda like HP and their Indigo hybrid click and monthly service charge.
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Kodak NexPress 2100 / NexPress 2500 Video | - »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon imagePRESS C1 print samples? Jeff Canon imagePRESS Digital Presses 14 04-01-2008 04:42 PM
Kodak NexPress 2100 / NexPress 2500 Video sorm Kodak NexPress Digital Presses 3 11-18-2007 04:57 PM
Canon ImagePRESS C1 irregular size duplex printing problem AndyM Canon Color Laser Printers & Color Copiers 5 10-31-2007 03:36 AM
Face Down Problem - Canon Imagepress Server T1 tanadin Canon Color Laser Printers & Color Copiers 5 05-29-2007 07:52 AM
Any talk yet of a mid-range Canon Imagepress? Jeff Canon Color Laser Printers & Color Copiers 0 03-04-2007 08:40 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Contact Us - Color Printing Forum - Sitemap - Print Directory - Top

© 2006-2008 Color Printing Forum - the new digital information source for color printers & the business of color printing.
Powered by vBulletin which is Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Canon, CLC, Docucolor, Electronics for Imaging, EFI, Fiery, Heidelberg, HP, Kodak, Imagerunner, Imagepress, Nexpress, Presstek, Ricoh, Ryobi, Xante, Xeikon, Xerox, and other Registered Trademarks are the property of their respective companies.
Google