Color Printing & Color Printer Forum
Offset Printing Press Forum: DI Presses


Go Back   Color Printing Forum > Offset Printing Press Forum > DI Presses

2 Color Offset Press 4+ Color Offset Press Direct Imaging Printing Press Digital Printing Press Color Copiers and Color Laser Printers Finishing Equipment Inkjet and Art Printers
2-Color Offset 4+ Color Offset Direct Imaging Digital Press Color Copiers Finishing Inkjet & Fine Art
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2008, 12:15 PM
somma somma is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: merlo - san luis - argentina
Posts: 22
Heidelberg DI Press I Want information abouta Quickmaster DI Classic

Dears:

I am new at this forum. I am from Argentina. I would like to know information about QM DI classic:

1 - print Quality, Is it like a convencional offset press?
2 - Cost of operation (plates, blankets, ink and other consumibles)
3 - Why Classic version are so cheaper than Plus or Pro version?
4 - What are the principals problems with these type of machines? Are some points that are very important to know before buy a QM DI?

I hope somebody could answer me these questions?

Thanks in advance

apollogies for my poor english
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2008, 02:25 PM
mrheidelberg mrheidelberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 117
Default

Hi,

Welcome to the forum.

I hope i can answer your questions.

The print quality is the same to a normal litho machine. The main difference is the limitation of the lazer diodes and the size of the dots they can put on a plate, 1270 and 2540 resolutions and generally at 175 lpi is the limit.

The costs of the consumables has decreased since the QM DI machine first came out. The plate cost is approx UK£600 (US$1,200) for a box of 4 rolls with 36 imagings per roll, Blankets approx £25 each, Plate wash rolls approx £3 each, Blanket felts approx £2 each, Ink (Toyo aqualess eco waterless ink) approx £20 per kg.

The Classic was the 1st QM DI version produced followed by the Plus and Pro. The Plus had many improvements mainly imaging speed, silicone extraction, ink ducts, the Pro had a touch screen interface and a stream feeder. The Plus is generally recognised to be the machine to go for at least unless cost is very important.

These machines have many electrical components and thus can be an issue. Generally the machanical side is reasonably reliable.

Hope this information helps,

Regards.

Last edited by mrheidelberg; 06-19-2008 at 07:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2008, 04:20 PM
somma somma is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: merlo - san luis - argentina
Posts: 22
Default

Hello:

thanks for your quick answer.

Do you think that QM 46 DI is a good machine? or do you prefer a Ryobi 3304?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2008, 04:27 PM
mrheidelberg mrheidelberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 117
Default

Hi,

The QM DI is a Heidelberg..............so yes it is a good machine.

Maybe someone else could comment on the Ryobi.

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2008, 07:08 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 280
Default

Quote:
generally 175dpi is the limit.
175 lpi (not dpi), right?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-16-2008, 08:43 PM
somma somma is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: merlo - san luis - argentina
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
175 lpi (not dpi), right?
you are right 175 LPI.

regards
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-18-2008, 05:19 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 280
Default

Hope my somewhat unnecessary reply didn't come off as rude or take the thread off-topic; just didn't want someone to google and say "boy those old machines sure were low resolution back then!"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2008, 07:03 AM
mrheidelberg mrheidelberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 117
Default

No problem Jeff, just a keystoke slip.

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2008, 10:25 AM
ksamin ksamin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bangladesh
Posts: 10
Send a message via MSN to ksamin
Default

36 imaging you have mentioned. Its it 4-color plates of 36 jobs?

Ink price is seems to be very high. May be 4 times higher than conventional offset color ink. Any alternative?

Regards from ksamin, Dhaka
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2008, 11:43 AM
mrheidelberg mrheidelberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 117
Default

Hi,

Yes it is 4 x 36.

Silicon based ink is more expensive than oil / vegetable based ink. There are other waterless silicon based ink suppliers but not all waterless ink manufactured is the same quality.

Regards.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
abouta, classic, di, information, quickmaster

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HP CM8060 cost per print information lina HP Edgeline Printers 10 10-21-2008 02:33 PM
used DI machines. Quickmaster 46-4(pro,plus,classic) mirve Offset & Digital Presses for sale 2 08-09-2008 12:06 PM
information on Heidelberg presses please shaneo1967 Heidelberg Printing Presses 1 06-04-2008 06:12 AM
short run jigsaw puzzle production - looking for prices and information Jeff Print Community Open Discussion 1 02-09-2008 09:56 PM
Ryobi 3304X , Classic 1996-1997 Classic mirve Offset & Digital Presses for sale 0 05-31-2007 07:48 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.


© 2006-2009 Color Printing Forum - the new digital information source for color printers & the business of color printing.
Powered by vBulletin which is Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Canon, CLC, Docucolor, Electronics for Imaging, EFI, Fiery, Heidelberg, HP, Kodak, Imagerunner, Imagepress, Nexpress, Presstek, Ricoh, Ryobi, Xante, Xeikon, Xerox, and other Registered Trademarks are the property of their respective companies.
Google