Color Printing & Color Printer Forum
Color Printing Workflow and Prepress: Computer Hardware


Go Back   Color Printing Forum > Color Printing Workflow and Prepress > Computer Hardware

2 Color Offset Press 4+ Color Offset Press Direct Imaging Printing Press Digital Printing Press Color Copiers and Color Laser Printers Finishing Equipment Inkjet and Art Printers
2-Color Offset 4+ Color Offset Direct Imaging Digital Press Color Copiers Finishing Inkjet & Fine Art
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2008, 03:11 AM
RyanC RyanC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default Why is my new Microtek Scanmaker so slow?

Today I installed a Microtek Scanmaker i900 http://www.microtekusa.com/smi900.html

I'm happy with the scan quality, but doing 600 dpi scans from the glass is slow - 1200 dpi takes ages. Are there any tips or tricks to speed it up without sacrificing scan quality?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:59 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 278
Default

If you're using the microtek scan driver make sure you do not have the digital ICE turned on unless you really need it to be. Also make sure the digital ICE color corection is not checked. The effect is good, but it takes forever for the scanner to perform the action. Even though it's "easy" in the sense that the scanner does the work, I find it a lot faster to do it with photoshop on the computer's CPU then wait many minutes for the scanner to remove some spots of dust, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2008, 04:21 AM
RyanC RyanC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks, but ICE is not checked, and it's still slow.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2008, 12:57 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 278
Default

Are you connected via USB or Firewire? If you're connecting the scanmaker i900 via usb, try connecting it via firewire. Even though usb2 in theory should be fast, I find this scanner runs much much faster connected via firewire (1394) on my windows systems, both xp and vista.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2008, 12:14 AM
RyanC RyanC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks! Connecting via firewire is much faster than via usb2 for this microtek scanner! I've heard that firewire is more efficient, but I don't have much firewire gear (printers, other scanner, cardreader, etc. are all usb2.) Is the speed increase particular to this scanner, or is firewire superior in general to usb2?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
microtek, scanmaker, slow

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ImagePress C1 and T1 Server too slow atsushi Canon Color Laser Printers & Color Copiers 2 09-07-2007 11:43 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.


© 2006-2009 Color Printing Forum - the new digital information source for color printers & the business of color printing.
Powered by vBulletin which is Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Canon, CLC, Docucolor, Electronics for Imaging, EFI, Fiery, Heidelberg, HP, Kodak, Imagerunner, Imagepress, Nexpress, Presstek, Ricoh, Ryobi, Xante, Xeikon, Xerox, and other Registered Trademarks are the property of their respective companies.
Google