| |||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 2-Color Offset | 4+ Color Offset | Direct Imaging | Digital Press | Color Copiers | Finishing | Inkjet & Fine Art |
| View Poll Results: Which SATA Raid controller would you recommend | |||
| 3Ware | | 1 | 33.33% |
| Adaptec | | 2 | 66.67% |
| Areca | | 0 | 0% |
| Other | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Looking for recommendations for a sata raid controller to control a group of 4 western digital 10k raptor hard drives. This could either be: A single RAID 10 array for performance + speed (I've never used raid 10) or A RAID 1 array for data archive every night A RAID 0 array for outright performance dealing with large corel and photoshop files throughout the day Possibly another RAID 0 array for printer spool and scratch disk (better to separate scratch from work disk, or having even more disks in a single raid-0 array?) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Adaptec are stable -- they build server grade for years (reputation built on scsi and scsi raid server adapters and controllers). The Adaptec 2820SA adapter has been a reliable workhorse so far. 3ware became famous for their SATA raid controllers and are a benchmark in the industry for sata raid specifically. Areca has a following now for it's blazing fast sata raid performance -- it's possibly the most recommended on forums like forums.2cpu.com for example. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Even though there is a negligable performance advantage and it's expensive per MB, I like the simplicity of RAID-1. In a worst case you're not totally dependent on the raid controller and as long as the controller doesn't corrupte the data in failure, either drive of the raid-1 set can be simply read on another controller if necessary. |